Click to see

Click to see
Obama countdown

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Benghazi, An Exercise in Realpolitik

In my partner's post Did Obama IGNORE Americans under attack inn Benghazi? Emails indicate yes. it's revealed that 300 to 400 national security figures received emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out. So we know that some nameless soul in the State Department didn't drop the ball by failing to bring the attack to the attention of the administration. Everybody who was anybody in the defense, state, and national security purviews knew Americans were under attack by terrorists. It is inconceivable that the Defense Department did not inform the president of the military options at his disposal, options that while bold, could have possibility saved the life of Ambassador Stevens and the other three Americans.

One thing we can ascertain with perfect certitude is that the administration did nothing. The proverbial 3 am call came in late afternoon before the dinner hour but Obama was out to lunch. Why was no attempt made to save the lives of the four Americans? The decision to act or not to act could only come from the president therefore it is almost axiomatic that the president knew and failed to act. The American public expects its presidents to protect the lives of all Americans especially members of the government and when the president fails to do so he invites a multitude of conspiratorial theories to explain his actions or lack thereof.

Rather than fly with the black helicopter crowd I prefer to think that the president failed his most important test because he was given bad advice by political operatives and one Valerie Jarrett. For some reason Jarrett hold almost Rasputin like power over the first family. Rumors indicate that three times she nixed the hit on Osama bin Laden. The decision to intervene in Lybia in the beginning was portayed as a tug of war between Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice who championed intervention and Valerie Jarrett who counseled to the contrary.

National Security advisor Tom Donilon is a veteran lobbyist and Democratic political hack who has dabbled in foreign affairs since the Clinton administration. He was well rewarded for his efforts by President Clinton who handed him the wealth enhancing title of Executive Vice President for Law and Policy at Fannie Mae.  Obama should have known that appointing a political hack to a national security position that he could expect to receive national security advice based on domestic political considerations.

David Plouffe ran Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and is now listed as a senior White House advisor. David Axelrod is the only campaign official in memory to frequently address questions of foreign affairs and national security on the Sunday talk show circuit.

When news of the attack on the Benghazi consulate reached the White House is it unreasonable to assume that the ongoing presidential campaign was not on the minds of Jarrett, Plouffe, and Donilon? How would this effect the campaign? For Obama's part, was he so wedded to his legalistic, leftist ideology that he could not bring himself to send American troops into a foreign country even if it meant the death of his ambassador? Remember the FBI was stalled in its so called investigation of the attack because it could not obtain visas. If the administration was put off by this Libyan action it did not publicly indicate as much.

In the end the truth will get but not until after the election which is the White House's hope. The American public is apt to see a White House too paralyzed by politics and ideology to act and a president too weak the execute the sworn duties of his office, to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

5 comments:

  1. I guess I'm with the black helicopter crowd on this one. Bad advice does not apply to bad character when people's lives are at stake. This was a horrendous politically craven decision to ignore the fact that it was not only a terrorist act but a decision was made to lie about it. Putting that aside, what pisses me off the most is that help could have been there in 60 minutes, yet nothing was done. How do you live with yourself when you make decisions like that? And I do mean with yourself because, as president, the buck stops at YOUR desk, not Valerie Jarrett's, no matter what SHE thinks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Before I accuse the White House of treason I'll look to other reasons such as political expediency, ideology, and incompetence to explain why nothing was done. No Republican on the House Oversight Committee has has put forth the theory that Stevens was to be kidnapped to be exchanged for the blind sheik or that he was covertly working with the Muslim Brotherhood. Short of a special prosecutor with a big budget and the power to subpoena the president I don't see those theories going anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, I understand the outrageous of the "kidnap" theory, which I put forward only as a conspiracy theory, though plausible.

    What is NOT plausible and not arguable is that no one NO ONE in that White House did anything for those men in Benghazi while that battle raged and 4 people died. That's a fact.

    That contention has nothing to do with the "kidnap" theory and everything to do with the emails that have been mysteriously released.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The kidnap theory was only one of three I've come across but the administration is inviting this sort of thing by its lies/silence. Let's guess the emails came from someone in State or intelligence who was miffed at Biden's nobody told us excuse.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think this thing is huge. Expanding. Huge. This is it. Not to be too dramatic about it. I just don't see how you explain away not sending help from guys who are an hour away from a 7 hour firefight. It's horrifying.

    ReplyDelete