For months, media outlets like the New York Times scolded conservatives over their concerns about rationed medical care. Sarah Palin outraged them by referring to “death panels” when the ObamaCare bill wound up containing language enabling “comparative effectiveness” boards as guiding lights for medical care decisions. Last July I wrote about comparative effectiveness, a medical-care rationing system, by asking the question of who says “no” in a government-run medical system. Today, the New York Times gives the same answer I did, conveniently after the passage of ObamaCare:
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Amazing! NYT suddenly encouraging health care rationing
Wow. This is amazing. The link is over to Hot Air, who takes it apart. Just incredible the way they mock people who were afraid of this very thing, but now they have what they want, we have to do the hard thing and say "no" to other people's health care needs. And isn't that great that they need to do the hard thing and say no to the little peep. You can bet Sulzberger over at the Times isn't going to say no to his own physical problems.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment