So the kerfuffle over the Obama author information of his being a Kenyan has created a stir.
Breitbart points out that (gee, who would think) each author submits his own biographical information according to the publishers' own guidelines to the writers of the author biographies.
Roger Simon thinks Obama, who obviously described himself as a Kenyan (I mean, seriously. How do you deny that he himself described himself this way on several, maybe even numerous, occasions?) was gaming the system, probably born in Hawaii, but was pulling an Elizabeth Warren in getting the most bang for their free bucks by lying about his/her background.
So we can't get too excited about this. As Rush says, Obama would like everyone to be focused on this kind of stuff rather than the economy.
But seriously.
Can we trust anything this man says?
Quite remarkable was the audio Rush played of Charlie Rose's interview with several reporters about how little they knew about Obama, after he was safely elected. He's creepy and completely created (like Julia) they said.
Text of the conversation is over at NoQuarters.
One wonders if any of these people can be trusted.
We areTHE RESISTANCE.
Click to see
Obama countdown
Friday, May 18, 2012
Chicago protests heat up
We have contrasting views of what's happening in the NoNato Chicago Occupier protest. Breitbart is there, with cameras catching the actions of the protestors and the reaction of the neighborhoods who are being invaded. Watch here:
We already know businessmen have been told not to wear the shirt and tie combo to avoid being attacked. A bank has closed today and Monday to avoid being stormed. Now the red and black "gang" colors of anarchists and communists are invading neighborhoods.
OTOH, NakedDC, whose writer lives in Chicago, mocks the well- informed occupiers who thought Rush Limbaugh lives and broadcasts in Chicago.
These people have been itching for a fight. We'll see if they get it. Already the communist affiliated Lawyers Guild is claiming eight protesters have been "disappeared" and, upon discovering them in jail, the guild claims they are confused and in "low spirits."
Ha. Haha. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
We already know businessmen have been told not to wear the shirt and tie combo to avoid being attacked. A bank has closed today and Monday to avoid being stormed. Now the red and black "gang" colors of anarchists and communists are invading neighborhoods.
OTOH, NakedDC, whose writer lives in Chicago, mocks the well- informed occupiers who thought Rush Limbaugh lives and broadcasts in Chicago.
These people have been itching for a fight. We'll see if they get it. Already the communist affiliated Lawyers Guild is claiming eight protesters have been "disappeared" and, upon discovering them in jail, the guild claims they are confused and in "low spirits."
Ha. Haha. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
With Obama, there is no conscience but his
The dishonesty of this administration continues, as Obama, et al, continue to blame Bush for everything that ever went wrong in this country.
It's not his fault, they wail.
Why should the economy be held against Obama?
After all, it's the Bush tax cuts, the wars, the "economic downturn" which are all due to Bush, not Obama.
Well, it's true that Bush was defending this country by fighting our enemies, something Obama seems loathe to do.
And it's true that Bush got those tax cuts passed with Democrat approval. And it's true that the expiration of those tax cuts is being called "taxmageddon."
Oh, and it's true that a huge "stimulus" was passed that created, oh, one or two hundred jobs, some in China. And it's true that Democrats, who'd held the Congress from 2007 until 2011, two years of which were a nightmare of complete control.
And it's true that the Democrats haven't passed a budget for THREE years.
Also true is the TARP bailout, the auto bailout, the numerous giveaways, the bailout of Fannie and Freddie.
Oh, and Obama has spent money on numerous failed projects.
But none of these financial fiascos are his fault.
He's completely innocent, they tell ya.
Even while, as the dishonesty continues, the jobless numbers declared last week to be improving have now been, again, revised.
That's ok.
We just want to be sure Obama gets his favorable numbers every week. Then next week we can go in and quietly "revise" those numbers closer to reality.
And, in keeping with having no consciences themselves, Pelosi does not support conscience clauses for religious folks.
Which, really, goes along with the whole "forget your religion when it comes to this government" mentality which doesn't seem to believe that anyone can have any conscience other than government approved conscience causes.
Pelosi calls conscience decisions "manufactured crises," which, indeed, to them, probably is, considering that they don't seem to have any regarding the rights of others.
Many organizations (doctors, religious leaders, AARP, unions) let the Obama organization run roughshod over the rights of the citizens of this nation. They had to know there'd be a debt to pay eventually.
Manufactured crises indeed.
Obama's the one who manufactured them.
It's not his fault, they wail.
Why should the economy be held against Obama?
After all, it's the Bush tax cuts, the wars, the "economic downturn" which are all due to Bush, not Obama.
Well, it's true that Bush was defending this country by fighting our enemies, something Obama seems loathe to do.
And it's true that Bush got those tax cuts passed with Democrat approval. And it's true that the expiration of those tax cuts is being called "taxmageddon."
Oh, and it's true that a huge "stimulus" was passed that created, oh, one or two hundred jobs, some in China. And it's true that Democrats, who'd held the Congress from 2007 until 2011, two years of which were a nightmare of complete control.
And it's true that the Democrats haven't passed a budget for THREE years.
Also true is the TARP bailout, the auto bailout, the numerous giveaways, the bailout of Fannie and Freddie.
Oh, and Obama has spent money on numerous failed projects.
But none of these financial fiascos are his fault.
He's completely innocent, they tell ya.
Even while, as the dishonesty continues, the jobless numbers declared last week to be improving have now been, again, revised.
That's ok.
We just want to be sure Obama gets his favorable numbers every week. Then next week we can go in and quietly "revise" those numbers closer to reality.
And, in keeping with having no consciences themselves, Pelosi does not support conscience clauses for religious folks.
Which, really, goes along with the whole "forget your religion when it comes to this government" mentality which doesn't seem to believe that anyone can have any conscience other than government approved conscience causes.
Pelosi calls conscience decisions "manufactured crises," which, indeed, to them, probably is, considering that they don't seem to have any regarding the rights of others.
Many organizations (doctors, religious leaders, AARP, unions) let the Obama organization run roughshod over the rights of the citizens of this nation. They had to know there'd be a debt to pay eventually.
Manufactured crises indeed.
Obama's the one who manufactured them.
What Geithner doesn't understand
It's pretty remarkable that the Treasury Secretary of the United States admits that he doesn't "understand" why the enormous and never ending increase in the debt limit of this country needs to be increased by "political politicians" in a "partisan political agenda."
The "deeply irresponsible" agenda includes trimming spending and trying to limit debt.
This contemptuous "Do you believe it" video reveals much about the partisanship, ignorance and partisan agenda of this administration.
We already know he's not into paying off his own debts unless he gets caught.
Now he's bringing the same sense of morality to our government.
Whoop.
The "deeply irresponsible" agenda includes trimming spending and trying to limit debt.
This contemptuous "Do you believe it" video reveals much about the partisanship, ignorance and partisan agenda of this administration.
We already know he's not into paying off his own debts unless he gets caught.
Now he's bringing the same sense of morality to our government.
Whoop.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
This Could Be Huge...Here's Hopin'
It started this afternoon on Breitbart and was picked up as the lead link on Drudge with follow-on links there of the MSM trying desperately to put out the fires.
Soon, the blogosphere was burning with reports that possibly, quite possibly, all the "birther" wacko, wingnuts who have questioned the Anointed One's birthplace might just be RIGHT.
This biography, written in 1991, quite probably by Obama himself, clearly states that he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii. If nothing else, he either lied then or he is lying now.
UPDATE 5/17/21 21:10
Update on Ulsterman Report...
UPDATE 5/17/21 21:10
Update on Ulsterman Report...
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Zimmerman WAS beaten
Via JustOneMinute, we learn that George Zimmerman's doctor treated him for 2 black eyes, a broken nose, a back injury and two cuts on the back of his head.
An autopsy revealed that Trayvon Martin's knuckles were bruised, consistent with Zimmerman's story, something not noticed by the Black mortician who publicly said Martin's body showed no signs of a struggle.
NY Post:
In fact, it becomes obvious that the information that has been released early was released intentionally to incite negative emotion and public frenzy against the "white Hispanic" George Zimmerman.
Remember that Zimmerman's neighborhood members called him first, relying on him as neighborhood watch captain. In fact, the Sanford Police Department advised calling Zimmerman if citizens were in need:
Does it really make sense that someone would call the police to report a suspicious person and then intentionally commit a hate crime of murdering the person he just reported?
The American Journal reports that the neighborhood was living "in fear" because of the breakins:
Pardon me while I belly laugh at that one.
Apparently we're supposed to believe that the man who had a broken nose, 2 black eyes, a back injury and 2 cuts on the back of his head was the abuser and the 17 year old with the bruised knuckles and the gunshot wound was the real victim.
As usual, the activists' and media's stories do not make sense.
Just don't you worry your pretty little head about that though.
An autopsy revealed that Trayvon Martin's knuckles were bruised, consistent with Zimmerman's story, something not noticed by the Black mortician who publicly said Martin's body showed no signs of a struggle.
NY Post:
“We could see no physical signs like there had been a scuffle [or] there had been a fight,” Kurtz told CBS News. “The hands — I didn’t see any knuckles, bruises or what have you.”Yet now we know that Martin did indeed have signs of a struggle and we have to wonder why each entity involved in this scandal, including the news media, the Black activists and the morticians and other professional persons involved (like the special prosecutor who cozied up to Martin's family immediately) have not only not been professional but have been downright deceitful in selecting what they will release to the public.
In fact, it becomes obvious that the information that has been released early was released intentionally to incite negative emotion and public frenzy against the "white Hispanic" George Zimmerman.
Remember that Zimmerman's neighborhood members called him first, relying on him as neighborhood watch captain. In fact, the Sanford Police Department advised calling Zimmerman if citizens were in need:
The Retreat at Twin Lakes e-newsletter for February 2012 noted: "The Sanford PD has announced an increased patrol within our neighborhood ... during peak crime hours.
"If you've been a victim of a crime in the community, after calling police, please contact our captain, George Zimmerman."So George Zimmerman calls the police to report Martin, who appeared to be casing the neighborhood, was suspended from his school 2 hours away for the third time, and a minute and a half after he calls, Martin is dead.
Does it really make sense that someone would call the police to report a suspicious person and then intentionally commit a hate crime of murdering the person he just reported?
The American Journal reports that the neighborhood was living "in fear" because of the breakins:
At least eight burglaries were reported within Twin Lakes in the 14 months prior to the Trayvon Martin shooting, according to the Sanford Police Department. Yet in a series of interviews, Twin Lakes residents said dozens of reports of attempted break-ins and would-be burglars casing homes had created an atmosphere of growing fear in the neighborhood.
In several of the incidents, witnesses identified the suspects to police as young black men. Twin Lakes is about 50 percent white, with an African-American and Hispanic population of about 20 percent each, roughly similar to the surrounding city of Sanford, according to U.S. Census data.An ABC legal analyst speculates that the bruised knuckles could indicate Martin was struggling to get away.
Pardon me while I belly laugh at that one.
Apparently we're supposed to believe that the man who had a broken nose, 2 black eyes, a back injury and 2 cuts on the back of his head was the abuser and the 17 year old with the bruised knuckles and the gunshot wound was the real victim.
As usual, the activists' and media's stories do not make sense.
Just don't you worry your pretty little head about that though.
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Saturday, May 12, 2012
The small man gets smaller
Ok, well, here ya go.
Obama's trying to look like he's reaching out to the common American, jetting from California to Nevada back to DC and back to California again.
What does this picture remind you of?
Obama's trying to look like he's reaching out to the common American, jetting from California to Nevada back to DC and back to California again.
What does this picture remind you of?
Ace is calling this Obama's Garage Tour, which is a pretty appropriate label, if you think about, since it's out in front of someone's garage.
Note the tiny Seal of the POTUS.
The adoring audience.
The fancy vehicle waiting to transport the POTUS from place to place.
Note especially the podium, heavy and ostentatious, so like the Greek columns of the past.
I especially like the black banner placed carefully around the President of the United States to keep the throngs away, whose intellect keeps him from achieving his potential in the White House.
We are not worthy.
We wouldn't want the hordes to sweep in and overwhelm him, after all.
Oh, and yes, this reminds me of the somewhat pretentious teleprompter use in the elementary classroom, which Snopes claims is an inaccurate portrayal of a real event.
Like, he DID have a real press conference in an elementary classroom.
But it was a press conference, guys, not a hobnob with the 8 year olds.
Just sayin'.
Ain't no shame in that garage tour.
Does kinda remind one of the situation room photo, which some have speculated might have been tampered with and where the little dinky head sits on the golf shirt and seems smaller than any other head in the room.
A small man getting smaller, in spite of his staff.
Obamites bully opponents, claim discrimination
Journolist is still alive, apparently, in the conveniently placed "Romney is a homophobe" story placed the day after Obama comes out to support gay marriage.
And, wow, this was so spontaneous on the part of Obama that they're selling t-shirts advertising his support of gay marriage 3 days later and, gee, they're not even back ordered.
It looks like the ridiculous WaPo smear job continues to fall apart.
The best takedown is over at Spectator.
Here John Hayward lays out the totality of the smear:
But Hayward also illustrates acts of valor Romney has committed dating back to 1994, something pretty much unheard of in the press. Indeed those three incidents are dramatic enough to be interesting to a Hollywood script writer, if Romney were instead a Democrat candidate for the presidency.
So this how they accomplish their attacks on character.
The meme is thrown out there, then they cite themselves and interview themselves reacting to the false story.
We can already see the results; they throw out a false and unprovable (and therefore pretty much irrefutable) story out there, then keep the story alive by repeating the story and discussing the public and journalistic reaction to the unproveable story.
Witness this video of a "moderator" scolding a guest for questioning her motives for repeating the story. The "moderator" condescends to the guest by cutting him off for not being willing tobe cut off conversate.
So now that the story is out there, we have hacks like Paul Begala writing hackster pieces like this at The Daily Beast: Paul Begala on Romney: Once a bully, always a bully.
Now those informed among us could say the same of the current POTUS, who famously admitted bullying a fellow student but Begala wouldn't be interested in that extrapolation.
In fact, any objective observer understands that the entire piece that Begala writes really is far more applicable to the current POTUS than Romney. Indeed, the comments at that article reveal that people are onto the Begala bait and switch. Criticize Romney for something of which Obama himself is guilty.
The real bully is Obama.
Heck, the Democrat party is even training House members how to accuse anyone who opposes their wishes of racism.
As if they don't know how to do that already. What a cottage industry.
Will these Democrat hacks denounce the tactics employed by the Obama team, which include running opposition research on donors to the Romney campaign who have nothing to do with politics except to donate to the political party of their choice; in the case of VanderSloot, he has lost business and friends as a result of the smear:
Meanwhile the press is already starting to inoculate the POTUS from repercussions from the Black community.
So we have a dope for POTUS who can't work his way out of a paper bag, who values the golf course more than executive office, who loves to party but hates to work, who loves hobnobbing with the rich but forgets how serious the recession because of his wealthy insularity of which he accuses his opponent.
And how does the press respond?
Obama's too smart for the job?
How do we know this? We haven't seen his grades, his transcripts, his writings, his scholarship material....
Oh,well, we'll just have to take his word for it.
Here's the LA Times article, in which the author concludes that there's just no room for smart people in the Oval Office anymore, whose potential hasn't been reached but, rather, has been "held back" by the Oval Office and, thus, we who are not worthy.
Last question: is anybody else creeped out by the fact that Barack Obama sits around bare chested wearing a sarong on Sundays?
And, wow, this was so spontaneous on the part of Obama that they're selling t-shirts advertising his support of gay marriage 3 days later and, gee, they're not even back ordered.
It looks like the ridiculous WaPo smear job continues to fall apart.
The best takedown is over at Spectator.
Here John Hayward lays out the totality of the smear:
The piece does a great deal of mind-reading to insinuate homophobia, and in an amazing set of concluding paragraphs, heavily implies that Romney essentiallymurdered this poor kid with his scissors – it just took his body four decades to collapse around his broken spirit. John Lauber died of liver cancer in 2004, an even the Postdramatically contrasts with Romney accepting the Distinguished Alumni award from the Cranbrook prep school, concluding with a melancholy salute to Lauber’s hair, which he never stopped bleaching blond.Hayward runs down the entire extent of the damage the Post did to itself with their inaccurate and overblown story, including the fact that when they were discovered to have been wrong on at least fact, they went back and changed the story without acknowledging it, only admitting they did this when Breitbart demanded a retraction and got it.
But Hayward also illustrates acts of valor Romney has committed dating back to 1994, something pretty much unheard of in the press. Indeed those three incidents are dramatic enough to be interesting to a Hollywood script writer, if Romney were instead a Democrat candidate for the presidency.
So this how they accomplish their attacks on character.
The meme is thrown out there, then they cite themselves and interview themselves reacting to the false story.
We can already see the results; they throw out a false and unprovable (and therefore pretty much irrefutable) story out there, then keep the story alive by repeating the story and discussing the public and journalistic reaction to the unproveable story.
Witness this video of a "moderator" scolding a guest for questioning her motives for repeating the story. The "moderator" condescends to the guest by cutting him off for not being willing to
So now that the story is out there, we have hacks like Paul Begala writing hackster pieces like this at The Daily Beast: Paul Begala on Romney: Once a bully, always a bully.
Now those informed among us could say the same of the current POTUS, who famously admitted bullying a fellow student but Begala wouldn't be interested in that extrapolation.
In fact, any objective observer understands that the entire piece that Begala writes really is far more applicable to the current POTUS than Romney. Indeed, the comments at that article reveal that people are onto the Begala bait and switch. Criticize Romney for something of which Obama himself is guilty.
The real bully is Obama.
Heck, the Democrat party is even training House members how to accuse anyone who opposes their wishes of racism.
As if they don't know how to do that already. What a cottage industry.
Will these Democrat hacks denounce the tactics employed by the Obama team, which include running opposition research on donors to the Romney campaign who have nothing to do with politics except to donate to the political party of their choice; in the case of VanderSloot, he has lost business and friends as a result of the smear:
That changed in January, with the first Super PAC disclosures. Liberal bloggers and media have since dug into his past, dredging up long-ago Idaho controversies that touched on gay issues. His detractors have spiraled these into accusations that Mr. VanderSloot is a "gay bashing thug." He's become a national political focus of attention, aided by the likes of partisan Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald and MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. Bloggers have harassed his children, visiting their social media accounts and asking for interviews and information.These are really nice people, doncha think?
Meanwhile the press is already starting to inoculate the POTUS from repercussions from the Black community.
So we have a dope for POTUS who can't work his way out of a paper bag, who values the golf course more than executive office, who loves to party but hates to work, who loves hobnobbing with the rich but forgets how serious the recession because of his wealthy insularity of which he accuses his opponent.
And how does the press respond?
Obama's too smart for the job?
How do we know this? We haven't seen his grades, his transcripts, his writings, his scholarship material....
Oh,well, we'll just have to take his word for it.
Here's the LA Times article, in which the author concludes that there's just no room for smart people in the Oval Office anymore, whose potential hasn't been reached but, rather, has been "held back" by the Oval Office and, thus, we who are not worthy.
Last question: is anybody else creeped out by the fact that Barack Obama sits around bare chested wearing a sarong on Sundays?
Astonishing MSNBC "moderator" video
But THIS incident takes the Offensive Democrat Seal of Approval.
The guy's trying to call this "moderator" out for hyping the non-story of something Romney did or didn't do that might or might not have happened 50 years ago.
Wow.
The guy's trying to call this "moderator" out for hyping the non-story of something Romney did or didn't do that might or might not have happened 50 years ago.
Wow.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
New Obama ad: was the guy laid off or not?
Real journalists are curious tonight about why Mr. Slagle, the Toledo who *stars* in this Obama ad is employed and that his employment history on Facebook has mysteriously disappeared since he was questioned.
This looks like another one of those "jobs saved" dealios, except we'll never really know since nature didn't really take its course as far as the auto industry was involved.
The Toledo Blade crows in this article that the suffering included real sacrifice, like giving up overtime, and that these ads should really benefit their guy, Mr. Obama:
Critics say taxpayers are still out $23 billion on the deal, that creditors and shareholders were not fairly treated, that it added to the national debt, and that the United Auto Workers received generous treatment as political payback for their support of Mr. Obama. UAW leaders say employees shared in the pain, giving up at least $7,000 annually each in the form of lost overtime, a canceled cost-of-living raise, and work-rule concessions.ABC notes this:
Republicans are trying to chip away at President Obama’s success with the auto industry by bringing attention to a battery maker that took stimulus money and then laid off workers.Apparently "saving" something means throwing money at it and then claiming you "saved" it, no matter if they lose jobs or are still financially on the diseased list. More to come on that.
Obama's dog may rise again
So let me get this straight.
Obama was sniffing cocaine the last two years of college.
He's got a Social Security number that originated in Connecticut even though he's never been there.
He's got a very mysterious birth certificate, a polygamous father, grades we've never seen, articles he's never written or released as editor of the Harvard Law Review.
He's got weird Commie connections up the wazoo including a surrogate father and a really wild mother who held court with some really really strange people.
Then one day Obama is "forced" to admit he's "evolved" on the issue of gay marriage, moved into the "right side of history" and made an "historic" proclamation that rocked the star universe into donating 15 million dollars in one day.
Strangely, coincidentally, the day after The Prince is "forced" to admit that he's on the "right side of history" the WaPo has a lengthy and extensive story on a Romney transgression supposed to have happened 50 years ago.
That wild man Romney is supposed to have cut a "presumed homosexual" someone's hair in high school forcefully.
Romney doesn't remember it but knows he was naughty in high school.
One of the sources cited in the article says it never happened.
And the "presumed homosexual" has been dead since 2004.
The other guys who remember the incident clearly are said to have Democrat connections.
Sounds kinda like the press has sent 12 reporters to Alaska to read Sarah Palin's emails.
Or hunted down some Democrat women to testify against Herman Cain.
Or found an obscure meaning no one's ever heard of for the word "macaca," a word that sounded like another word that someone may believe is a racial slur for a tribe nobody's ever heard of.
Yeah, that wild man Romney's our guy.
Those rascals better watch it or this incident may enter dog territory.
Obama was sniffing cocaine the last two years of college.
He's got a Social Security number that originated in Connecticut even though he's never been there.
He's got a very mysterious birth certificate, a polygamous father, grades we've never seen, articles he's never written or released as editor of the Harvard Law Review.
He's got weird Commie connections up the wazoo including a surrogate father and a really wild mother who held court with some really really strange people.
Then one day Obama is "forced" to admit he's "evolved" on the issue of gay marriage, moved into the "right side of history" and made an "historic" proclamation that rocked the star universe into donating 15 million dollars in one day.
Strangely, coincidentally, the day after The Prince is "forced" to admit that he's on the "right side of history" the WaPo has a lengthy and extensive story on a Romney transgression supposed to have happened 50 years ago.
That wild man Romney is supposed to have cut a "presumed homosexual" someone's hair in high school forcefully.
Romney doesn't remember it but knows he was naughty in high school.
One of the sources cited in the article says it never happened.
And the "presumed homosexual" has been dead since 2004.
The other guys who remember the incident clearly are said to have Democrat connections.
Sounds kinda like the press has sent 12 reporters to Alaska to read Sarah Palin's emails.
Or hunted down some Democrat women to testify against Herman Cain.
Or found an obscure meaning no one's ever heard of for the word "macaca," a word that sounded like another word that someone may believe is a racial slur for a tribe nobody's ever heard of.
Yeah, that wild man Romney's our guy.
Those rascals better watch it or this incident may enter dog territory.
A Very Sad Story About A Bear...
Everyone should heed the warnings not to feed wildlife because they become dependent and don't forage for themselves any longer.
It is such a tragedy to see what has been done to our country's wildlife. The photo below captures a disturbing trend that is beginning to affect U.S. wildlife.
Animals that formerly were self-sufficient are now showing signs of belonging to the Democrat Party.
They have apparently learned to just sit and wait for the government to step in and provide for their care and sustenance.
This photo is of a black bear in Montana turned Democrat. He's nicknamed Bearack Obearma.
It is believed that he has become a campground organizer.
Fast And Furious Update
This blog has been commenting on the illegal sales of guns last year by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Mexican drug cartels resulting in the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens and at least two US Border Patrol agents. Involved in this scheme, it seems, were members of the DEA, ATF, FBI, ICE and DHS. To this date, not one member of any of these organizations has been fired for this illegal act.
A congressional investigation has been stonewalled for over a year by Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States and Obama's right hand man.
Included in the amendment was an order preventing Obama's Department of Justice from suing states for voter I.D. laws among other issues included in the amendment.
With a Harry Reid controlled Senate this amendment will have two chances of passing: slim and none.
However, it does show that even some Democrat lawmakers have had it with Holder and his racist Department of Justice.
One can always hope...
OccupyDC moves closer to Obama
The SEIU is a union known for the use of violence to get what they want; they also are trying to force moms and dads carrying for their disabled children in their home to unionize whether they want to or not.
The SEIU also has strong ties to the Obama campaign, contributing $70 million to the Obama campaign.
In fact, Obama's ties to the SEIU "go way back."
They also have connections to numerous shadowy non-profit organizations that storm banks and businesses in protest of their profit margins or shadowy business policies.
Now we get to Obama's ties to the Occupy movement, which he says is "not that different than the tea party movement," when the truth is that the Tea Party sprang up spontaneously while the Occupy movement is structured and paid for by unions and shadowy Soros groups and the Canadian magazine Adbusters.
Obama's speeches have consistently echoed the Occupy themes, in fact saying "We are on their side."
Now we learn that the SEIU has bought at the cost of $4000 a month official offices for the Occupy movement in Washington, DC.
The SEIU will be paying for these offices for six months. Hm. They moved in Monday, May 7. T
Six months will put the Occupy movement in those fancy digs a few blocks from the White House right up until the day before the election.
Hm. Now what would be the purpose behind that?
It's not like the White House hasn't already expressed solidarity.
But it surely seems as if the violent Occupy movement is almost taking part in government, or at least in lobbying for itself and its causes. Why else would you need fancy offices? Three?
Washington Examiner:
Ah, yes. Violence.
An aspect of that both movements seem to share.
The Occupy movement and the SEIU.
When will President Obama denounce the violence, rather than support it?
Some SEIU members recently have protested the use of their union dollars to support such leftwing causes as the Occupy movement, even sitting for interviews on FNC to proclaim that union members themselves are the 99% and that union administrators are the 1%, given their exalted positions, salaries, perks and favors.
Indeed.
We were wondering when they'd figure that out.
The SEIU also has strong ties to the Obama campaign, contributing $70 million to the Obama campaign.
In fact, Obama's ties to the SEIU "go way back."
They also have connections to numerous shadowy non-profit organizations that storm banks and businesses in protest of their profit margins or shadowy business policies.
Now we get to Obama's ties to the Occupy movement, which he says is "not that different than the tea party movement," when the truth is that the Tea Party sprang up spontaneously while the Occupy movement is structured and paid for by unions and shadowy Soros groups and the Canadian magazine Adbusters.
Obama's speeches have consistently echoed the Occupy themes, in fact saying "We are on their side."
Now we learn that the SEIU has bought at the cost of $4000 a month official offices for the Occupy movement in Washington, DC.
The SEIU will be paying for these offices for six months. Hm. They moved in Monday, May 7. T
Six months will put the Occupy movement in those fancy digs a few blocks from the White House right up until the day before the election.
Hm. Now what would be the purpose behind that?
It's not like the White House hasn't already expressed solidarity.
But it surely seems as if the violent Occupy movement is almost taking part in government, or at least in lobbying for itself and its causes. Why else would you need fancy offices? Three?
Washington Examiner:
Protester Sam Jewler said Occupiers still don't agree with the SEIU's support of Obama, who embraced the Occupy movement early on but has said little about it since Occupiers and police clashed in New York, Oakland, Calif., San Francisco and elsewhere.
Still, Jewler said Occupiers recognize they have common interests with labor unions, like fighting income inequality, on which they can work together. Occupiers said they view the union's backing as a donation with no strings attached.So why don't we do away with this charade that the Occupiers aren't being manipulated and controlled by the SEIU, although who knows where criminal behavior of the Occupiers will lead, given its history of violence.
Ah, yes. Violence.
An aspect of that both movements seem to share.
The Occupy movement and the SEIU.
When will President Obama denounce the violence, rather than support it?
Some SEIU members recently have protested the use of their union dollars to support such leftwing causes as the Occupy movement, even sitting for interviews on FNC to proclaim that union members themselves are the 99% and that union administrators are the 1%, given their exalted positions, salaries, perks and favors.
Indeed.
We were wondering when they'd figure that out.
Michelle Malkin to speak in Perrysburg
Flyer here
Northwest Ohio Conservative Coalition
Dedicated to the Pursuit of Conservative Political Principles
May Day Conference Saturday, May 19
Hilton Garden Inn Perrysburg
Speakers include
Matt Kibbe of FreedomWorks
and
Michelle Malkin
Sponsored by the Northwest Ohio Conservative Coalition
Saturday, May 19, 2012 9am – 5pm
Spend the a few hours, or the entire day with like minded conservatives
Forums and Panels - Find answers to the questions you may have!
Featuring local, state, and country-wide Conservative Organizations to answer your questions.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Obama distracts from yesterday's elections
So Biden mentions the other day that he supports gay marriage, like Dick Cheney.
We all know that Barack Hussein Obama has supported gay marriage forever until it was politically not expedient. He was just biding his time until the day after the election, as he told Medevev about other little matters, presumably one of which is ridding ourselves of those tiresome nuclear bombs and any nuclear defense we might have.
So today Obama grants a sympathetic reporter an interview ex cathedra in which he says his 11 and 13 year old daughters, who are off limits to the press and critics but are part of Obama's campaign, persuaded him to change his mind.
It was interesting that The Five on FNC led off with this story.
This story, in spite of the astounding rout Democrats suffered yesterday, a mini rout equivalent in psy ops to the 2010 campaign.
What happened yesterday? Gay marriage was rejected in N. Carolina; one of the reasons Obama didn't want to affirm gay marriage yet is that two Democrat key constituencies are Hispanics and Blacks and they reject gay marriage.
In addition to the gay marriage rejection was the turnout in Wisconsin. Millions and millions of union dollars have been pumped into Wisconsin via national union efforts to get rid of Gov. Walker and his policies, yet turnout for the Republicans yesterday, who had no one opposing Gov. Walker, were equivalent if not better than turnout for the Democrats primary.
And who did Democrats select to run against Walker?
Barrett, the man Walker defeated. Barrett, who was not supported by the unions (Falk was). Barrett, mayor of a city whose unemployment rate far exceeds the state and national averages.
Then there's the convict in West Virginia who won 41% of the vote against Barack Obama, a protest vote indeed.
Yesterday's elections have knocked the socks off liberals.
So why did Obama make this "historic" and astounding announcement?
Obviously it's a distraction from yesterday's developments.
Obviously they're running interference.
Obviously they don't want YOU or anyone else to notice what happened yesterday.
Fat chance.
We all know that Barack Hussein Obama has supported gay marriage forever until it was politically not expedient. He was just biding his time until the day after the election, as he told Medevev about other little matters, presumably one of which is ridding ourselves of those tiresome nuclear bombs and any nuclear defense we might have.
So today Obama grants a sympathetic reporter an interview ex cathedra in which he says his 11 and 13 year old daughters, who are off limits to the press and critics but are part of Obama's campaign, persuaded him to change his mind.
It was interesting that The Five on FNC led off with this story.
This story, in spite of the astounding rout Democrats suffered yesterday, a mini rout equivalent in psy ops to the 2010 campaign.
What happened yesterday? Gay marriage was rejected in N. Carolina; one of the reasons Obama didn't want to affirm gay marriage yet is that two Democrat key constituencies are Hispanics and Blacks and they reject gay marriage.
In addition to the gay marriage rejection was the turnout in Wisconsin. Millions and millions of union dollars have been pumped into Wisconsin via national union efforts to get rid of Gov. Walker and his policies, yet turnout for the Republicans yesterday, who had no one opposing Gov. Walker, were equivalent if not better than turnout for the Democrats primary.
And who did Democrats select to run against Walker?
Barrett, the man Walker defeated. Barrett, who was not supported by the unions (Falk was). Barrett, mayor of a city whose unemployment rate far exceeds the state and national averages.
Then there's the convict in West Virginia who won 41% of the vote against Barack Obama, a protest vote indeed.
Yesterday's elections have knocked the socks off liberals.
So why did Obama make this "historic" and astounding announcement?
Obviously it's a distraction from yesterday's developments.
Obviously they're running interference.
Obviously they don't want YOU or anyone else to notice what happened yesterday.
Fat chance.
Hoisted on their own petards
The thing is if you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
(That phrase is not to be taken literally in this post.)
Take, for example, the whole dog thing.
Axelrod took up the "Mitt tortured his dog" meme in January, though it had been bouncing around the web by various nefarious persons for years.
When the wags in the conservative blogosphere finally decided to throw the ball back, the Obama crowd was quickly silenced because, though dogs really do like to feel the wind in their hair, not many of them like to be eaten, which Obama admitted doing.
So recently a few dingdongs in the liberal MSM decided to go after Ann Romney for an expensive blouse she wore, thinking Michelle Obama would be inoculated from the same "your clothes are expensive not like the 99%" accusation because she has so recently gone on this populist routine...."I shop at Target..." "I work out in the White House..." "I wear J. Crew..."
Unfortunately there are waaaaaay too many examples of Michelle Obama's expensive lifestyle, though Lawrence O'Donnell would surely not count the famous trips around the world with her entourage thumbing her nose at the 99%.
Washington Free Beacon has a short rundown of the moulah Michelle blows on some of her outfits, some which really suck.
But it really does seem pretty heartless when you go to a poor country or soup kitchen and wear outfits that cost as much as those people make in six months.
It is true that the cost of First Ladies' clothing hasn't been remarkable since the media attacked Nancy Reagan, but it sure is funny when these jokers, who so easily wield figurative swords against others are caught in their own schemes.
We can only hope this happens more often, and it is highly likely since the whole name "conservative" seems to be morphing.
Into words like "winner."
And "populist."
And "everyman."
And "retaliator."
Maybe even "comedian."
Then there's the whole Elizabeth Warren debacle. She had touted a possible Native American relative in her background, her proof being her mother's high cheekbones like all the Indians but, having brought this subject up in the past to benefit herself, someone asked what the deal was on that, thus spurring geneological investigations into her background.
And voila! Guess what we find out.
What was supposed to be an advantage for Warren turned out to be not only a lie, but a disadvantage because it has been discovered her relative was actually a Cherokee killer.
Then Michelle Obama who endlessly lectures the rest of us to eat carrots and not Whoppers of any kind has been told she'd better not be pictured so often eating ANY of the junk food she likes so much. (Remember when the Secret Service confiscated the cell phones of White Castle diners so they couldn't take pictures of her chowing down? Heh.) Likewise that skinny crow who is her husband is lectured to clean up his act.
Hoisted, man, hoisted.
And how about this?
Democrat celebrity, 1 percenter and eco-hypocrite John Travolta has been accused of sexual assalt. This is the way the accuser refers to himself:
For now.
(That phrase is not to be taken literally in this post.)
Take, for example, the whole dog thing.
Axelrod took up the "Mitt tortured his dog" meme in January, though it had been bouncing around the web by various nefarious persons for years.
When the wags in the conservative blogosphere finally decided to throw the ball back, the Obama crowd was quickly silenced because, though dogs really do like to feel the wind in their hair, not many of them like to be eaten, which Obama admitted doing.
So recently a few dingdongs in the liberal MSM decided to go after Ann Romney for an expensive blouse she wore, thinking Michelle Obama would be inoculated from the same "your clothes are expensive not like the 99%" accusation because she has so recently gone on this populist routine...."I shop at Target..." "I work out in the White House..." "I wear J. Crew..."
Unfortunately there are waaaaaay too many examples of Michelle Obama's expensive lifestyle, though Lawrence O'Donnell would surely not count the famous trips around the world with her entourage thumbing her nose at the 99%.
Washington Free Beacon has a short rundown of the moulah Michelle blows on some of her outfits, some which really suck.
On March 13th, Michelle Obama wore a $2,720 L’Wren Scott cardigan to play tennisat a mini-Olympics event with local school children.
Even in trips to the third world, Mrs. Obama makes sure to dress first-class. On July 12, 2009, she wore a Sophie Theallet dress while visiting a hospital in Ghana. Similar Sophie Theallet dresses retail for $1,295 at Saks Fifth Avenue. The per capita GDP of Ghana is $3,100.Personally I don't care what she wears or spends on clothes, although I find it highly amusing because her clothes choices are sometimes so absurd.
But it really does seem pretty heartless when you go to a poor country or soup kitchen and wear outfits that cost as much as those people make in six months.
It is true that the cost of First Ladies' clothing hasn't been remarkable since the media attacked Nancy Reagan, but it sure is funny when these jokers, who so easily wield figurative swords against others are caught in their own schemes.
We can only hope this happens more often, and it is highly likely since the whole name "conservative" seems to be morphing.
Into words like "winner."
And "populist."
And "everyman."
And "retaliator."
Maybe even "comedian."
Then there's the whole Elizabeth Warren debacle. She had touted a possible Native American relative in her background, her proof being her mother's high cheekbones like all the Indians but, having brought this subject up in the past to benefit herself, someone asked what the deal was on that, thus spurring geneological investigations into her background.
And voila! Guess what we find out.
What was supposed to be an advantage for Warren turned out to be not only a lie, but a disadvantage because it has been discovered her relative was actually a Cherokee killer.
Then Michelle Obama who endlessly lectures the rest of us to eat carrots and not Whoppers of any kind has been told she'd better not be pictured so often eating ANY of the junk food she likes so much. (Remember when the Secret Service confiscated the cell phones of White Castle diners so they couldn't take pictures of her chowing down? Heh.) Likewise that skinny crow who is her husband is lectured to clean up his act.
Hoisted, man, hoisted.
And how about this?
Democrat celebrity, 1 percenter and eco-hypocrite John Travolta has been accused of sexual assalt. This is the way the accuser refers to himself:
““I represent the 99 per cent of the population, the working class, and I was put in an inappropriate situation that I didn’t put myself in. It is not for Mr. Singer to deny me my right!”I could go on but I'll cut it out.
For now.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Mourdock wins...let the spin begin!
Geraghty at NRO warns that now that Tea Partier Mourdock, not necessarily loved by Hoosierman, Dems are going to try to spin the win, portraying Mourdock's opponent as a moderate, barely mentioning the word "Democrat."
And every time a race is tight, they somehow lose the liberal aspects of being a Democrat.
Like our president.
Think of how he portrayed himself.
A uniter.
No red or blue, just Americans.
A post racial President.
Ha.
Can I laugh loudly enough on that one?
Democrats have convinced themselves that if Mourdock wins the primary, their nominee, Rep. Joe Donnelly, will have a healthy shot at winning the Senate seat in November. (Only one poll has pitted the pair in a hypothetical match-up recently, and it showed a tie.) But Donnelly hung on to his House seat in 2010 by emphasizing border security and explicitly running against “the Washington crowd,” depicting President Obama and Speaker Pelosi. (His ads carefully avoided using the term, ‘Democrat.’) He won by less than two percentage points that year.It's interesting that every time Democrats get into trouble with the law, which is often, they somehow lose the name "Democrat."
And every time a race is tight, they somehow lose the liberal aspects of being a Democrat.
Like our president.
Think of how he portrayed himself.
A uniter.
No red or blue, just Americans.
A post racial President.
Ha.
Can I laugh loudly enough on that one?
Obama: denounce others for what they do themselves
It is revealed that give Occupy Cleveland members planned to blow up a bridge on a weekend that they had advertised a family friendly outing. Occupy bomber Anthony Hayne's name is on the lease of the building where Occupy Clevelanders have been living.
Many of the Occupiers showed up in court in support of their fellow bombers.
Pelosi, Reid and Obama himself have endorsed sympathetic portrayals of the Occupiers.
Have they been confronted over their endorsement of this homegrown terrorist group?
No.
Instead the Obama campaign has attacked Romney for a side comment made by a Romney supporter in which someone muttered that Obama should be tried for treason.
Full story at Powerline.
Will Romney denounce the call of treason?
I dunno. Let me think about it. Has Obama denounced Bill Maher for his offenses too numerous to list?
This pathetic attempt at redirection is typical of the Narcissist in Chief. Continue to support criminals like Corzine, OWS and Geithner but feign horror at a silly extraneous episode for which Romney was not responsible.
These double standards continue to dog him throughout this campaign.
Will Romney denounce the call of treason?
I dunno. Let me think about it. Has Obama denounced Bill Maher for his offenses too numerous to list?
This pathetic attempt at redirection is typical of the Narcissist in Chief. Continue to support criminals like Corzine, OWS and Geithner but feign horror at a silly extraneous episode for which Romney was not responsible.
These double standards continue to dog him throughout this campaign.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)