Peer reviewed global warming articles

In case you caught the Ed Begley meltdown on Cavuto with Stuart Varney the other day (video of it is all over the web), you heard him repeatedly saying, "Don't get your information from me or Rush Limbaugh! Just read the peer reviewed articles! That's where you'll get the truth! Read the peer reviews!" This is an obvious meme being repeated to stave off criticism of the abominable behavior of the exposed scientists. Well, here's some commentary about those wonderful peer reviewed articles:

But what stood out most for me was extensive evidence of the hijacking of the "peer review" process to enforce global warming dogma. Peer review is the practice of subjecting scientific papers to review by other scientists with relevant expertise before they can be published in professional journals. The idea is to weed out research with obvious flaws or weak arguments, but there is a clear danger that such a process will simply reinforce groupthink. If it is corrupted, peer review can be a mechanism for an entrenched establishment to exclude legitimate challenges by simply refusing to give critics a hearing
.And that is precisely what we find.