In keeping with my contention that this was a pretty darned embarrassing week for Leftists, let me point out Rosie O'Donnell's sullen comments on her new revised View that the lust for oil and financial gain is at the bottom of O'bama's decision to bomb Syria.
One problem.
Syria doesn't have much, um, oil.
In fact, as the Powerline blog daddies point out, they provide one half of one percent of the world's oil, not to mention that the US sits on top of more oil than any other country if we'd only access it.
And then there's that problem if you bomb the oil wells, you're not going to get much oil out of it, eh.
So here she is, in all her glory.
Presenting Ms. Rosie O'Donnell, Messenger of Peace. Oh, wait. That's Leo DiCrapio.
Never mind.
That these people openly say such stupid uninformed things on national tv reveals their not only their bodaciousness but also their panic because few people believe them anymore. Climate change is failing as a global religion because it's too expensive, it accomplishes little and even if all the proposed measures were in place, these measures would only hurt poor people and line the pockets of the "one percent" elitist David "crease in the pants" Brooks so wants to maintain.
O'Donnell has a history of making wackadoodle comments dating back at least to the "first time in history steel has melted" on 9/11, a point so ridiculous that Popular Mechanics wrote a book about it.
But, see, you can say stupid stuff like this when you're Leftwing.
On a related note, will Ed Schulz or any other member of the lynch mob ever apologize to George Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et al, for the unfounded allegations that the liberation of Iraq was "all about oil"???
ReplyDeleteReally? Why did we not see a drop of Iraqi petro? Maybe it was about something else. Maybe.
Yeah, you gotta love the half hearted Code Pink protests. The only reason they're doing ANYTHING is because they've been called out so much for their hypocrisy. Horse hockey.
ReplyDelete