Well, it's pretty obvious at this point that the prosecutor's (let's pray together with the victim's family) choices are political.
Not sure why Zimmerman claimed apology to Martin's parents. It can make him look like, "Hey, I wouldn't have shot him if I knew he was 17," when, in reality no matter what age the "boychild" was, if the "child" was an aggressor, he had to be fended off.
There's no information that Zimmerman was the aggressor.
At this point, it's a "he said/Sharpton says" argument. Ugh.
You gotta love the faux outrage of the attorneys however, that Martin's parents' attorneys expressed. Martin's parents have been schooled in faux outrage to maximize the desired outcome. ABC:
Ben Crump, a lawyer for Martin's parents, said the family was furious that Zimmerman could "give this self serving apology so he could get a bond." One of the lawyers for the family called the apology "disingenuous and insincere."
Zimmerman, 28, is being held on charges of second-degree murder for the Feb. 26 shooting of Martin, 17, which could carry a life sentence if he is convicted.The prosecutors have to deal with this photo ABC revealed, whose omission Dershowitz calls "grave ethical violation,"
This case has been pretty appalling, start to finish.
No comments:
Post a Comment