Global warming scam suffers another blow

  Some of the natives are off the reservation with regard to AGW, aka the global warming hoax. 
  Sixteen scientists recently wrote an op ed in the WSJ decrying the claims of global warmists and pointing out that many younger scientists are skeptical of AGW but are afraid to say so publicly because of fear of punishment, which, of course, is very sciencey of the AGW proponents. 
  Not political at all, eh?
  Now a book by a prominent scientist is being released that will rock the "scientific" community, which turns out to be just another pep club for favorites causes, little proof and lots of rah rahing and deception.
  This is climate news from Germany:

  “THE CO2 LIES … pure fear-mongering … should we blindly trust the experts?”That’s what Germany’s leading daily Bild(see photo) wrote in its print and online editions today, on the very day that renowned publisher Hoffmann & Campe officially released a skeptic book – one written by a prominent socialist and environmental figure.

  There's great dismay and hand wringing over the discovery that the Himalayas haven't lost any ice in 10 years, unlike the claims of some "scientists," who have had to uncomfortably rearrange their argument. You know, like going from global warming to climate change, conveniently capturing any weather events as evidence that the world's income needs to be redistributing and that you need to start riding your bike.

  Climate Resistance points out that, even though the above cited Telegraph author admits the truth, he still claims the change in "facts" makes no difference. There should still be great concern over the direction of CO2, which, incidentally, humans exude and there are a lot of us, which is really the problem for many of these "scientists," who also get great financial benefit for their "studies."

And the same is true of the most recent discovery. Of course it means “that concerns about climate change are overblown”. What else could it possibly mean, when one of the concerns turns out — yet again, as it happens — to have been overblown? How many times were the Himalayan glaciers pointed at? How many times did sceptics reply that there wasn’t sufficient data? how many times did alarmists claim in response that the sceptics had ‘denied the science’, and even that they were being paid for by Big Oil? I have quite definitely lost count. Donald R. Prothero, like many before him, tried to make the claim that a billion people depend on the glaciers. In just one discovery, we’ve established that Climate Change is a problem which has been reduced by that same magnitude. It’s a billion people less of a problem.

  You'd think these bozos would give up, at some point, and move to another scam but then, there's a lot of money and power at stake.