Is EPA bribing organizations to support their claims?

  Look, if things are really so bad environmentally, why does the EPA need to make things up? Why does the EPA need to bribe people to support their causes? Why WOULD you give grants and take lobbying dollars from organizations if it would make it look like you all were in collusion?
  Yet that is exactly what the EPA has been doing. We covered the EPA's funding of various environmental groups who will publicly support EPA's claims of environmental danger in an earlier post:

The EPA has been setting the stage for this for some time by funding physicians with grants to "study" the impact of the environment on the chilluns. Gee, I wonder how the results of those grants will turn out?

  From the Physicians for Social Responsibility website:

Physicians for Social Responsibility is a non-profit organization that is the medical and public health voice for policies to prevent nuclear war and proliferation and to slow, stop and reverse global warming and toxic degradation of the environment. PSR’s 50,000 health professionals and concerned citizen members and e-activists, 31 PSR chapters, and 41 student PSR chapters at medical and public health schools, along with national and chapter staff, form a unique nationwide network committed to a safer and healthy world. 

  The following ad is the subject of an editorial question in the Washington Examiner:


  The Examiner wants to know why the American Lung Association has taken millions of taxpayer dollars from the EPA:

So the Red Carriage ad is not about protecting public health. It's about protecting EPA's power. And it's about the American Lung Association acting like EPA's chief lobbyist.

That doesn't look good because the EPA paid the American Lung Association's Washington headquarters $7.7 million, according to the EPA's website. here ....[SNIP]  The EPA website also shows the agency paid $20.4 million taxpayer dollars to 61 American Lung Association affiliates. That looks like collusion and conflict of interest to me.

  This is the same sad story, over and over. They can't get what they want honestly so they go through the back door, using taxpayer dollars to fund their pet projects which are meant to remodel Americans' behavior and remake America in the image of Barack Obama.