King and queen, the military and justice

  This is something we've suspected all along. A total disregard for money, for appearances, for concern for others...over at a gossip website called Showbizspy they are reporting on a new National Enquirer column about the subject. Read it here.
  Meanwhile, The One's total disregard and lack of concern for the military is surfacing over at Commentary, where Rubin dissects a NY Times article:

This was a man not only unprepared to be president but disposed to shirk the most important aspect of the job. It is a measure of his hubris and stubbornness that he has refused to, as Feaver succinctly puts it, “embrace” the role, that is, to commit in word and deed his full attention and effort to leading the country in war. He doesn’t want to be a wartime president? Well, sorry — he is.

The only comfort one can draw from this appalling portrait is that perhaps, just perhaps, after November, when his dream of transforming America is crushed by an electoral blow-back, he will belatedly do his job.

The New York Post has an article about the lack of interest in pursuing justice in the Cole case. Once again, "the king" has decided what is true and what is not, what is justice and what is not and what deserves his limited attention and what deserves nothing:

"It seems like nobody really cares," says Gloria Clodfelter, whose 21-year-old son died in the Cole bombing. Like the KSM trial and Obama's stance on the Ground Zero mosque, the decision to suspend the al Nashiri proceedings has nothing to do with justice and a lot to do with politics. The shame is that, once again, those who suffer are the families of those killed by terror, not the terrorists themselves