The documents that were given to the Congressional committee investigating the incident were heavily redacted, as if it were a security problem to release them in their entirety, a problem that was apparently rectified when Judicial Watch FOIA'ed them in the lawsuit. "Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and a possible kidnap attempt."
Carney got nailed at the White House briefing today, just as he claimed that the released emails had nothing to do with the Benghazi terrorist attack but rather with the Middle East in general.
Three days later, Hillary Clinton glad handed the families of the murdered Americans in front of four coffins, lying to their faces that the attack was about an "awful video" rather than a September 11, forewarned and State Department -ill-prepared- terrorist attack.
Daily Caller has her words to those families here:
“This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing do to with.”Hillary knew then the attack was not about a video and yet she persisted in claiming that she and the administration were not responsible for the lack of adequate security at the embassy in Benghazi. Katie Pavlich:
Despite knowing Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the very beginning, after all she was briefed by Hicks who was on the ground, Clinton shamelessly stood in front of the flag draped caskets of dead Americans and blamed a YouTube video anyway.When queried, she reminds us: What difference does it make?
I might remind y'all that Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State when 4 American State Dept employees were murdered under her watch and who claimed it was all over a "video," was fired by a Democrat from working on the Watergate Investigation.
....when she was an attorney working on the Watergate investigation, she was fired by her supervisor for “lying, unethical behavior.”
Jerry Zeifman, who said he is a lifelong Democrat, was a supervisor for 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. When the investigation was complete, Zeifman said he fired Hillary and refused to give her a recommendation.
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.Hillary was intending "to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation." And "in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception."
This deceptive illicit behavior is exactly what is on display in the Benghazi matter.
Does anyone doubt that a 65 year old who was willing at 27 to deny counsel to a defendant, to lie and cheat to prevent the truth about her political party from coming out, who repeatedly dipped her fingers into scandal after scandal in her husband's administration, who was suspected of misusing documents for her party's benefit, whose department somehow "misplaced" 6$ billion during her tenure at State.
That Hillary Clinton.
That that Hillary Clinton would energetically and blithely cover up her department's involvement in incompetence, deception and fraud regarding the murder of four Americans in Benghazi?
I guess we'll see what difference it makes.